zhenbo

ISSN?0253-3782 CN?11-2021/P

宁夏地区Lg波衰减及场地响应特征

张锦玲 ,? 朱新运 ,? 马起杨

引用本文: 张锦玲,?朱新运,?马起杨. 2019.?宁夏地区Lg波衰减及场地响应特征.?如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵学报,?41(4):?425-434. doi: 10.11939/jass.20180134 shu
Citation:? Zhang Jinling,?Zhu Xinyun,?Ma Qiyang. 2019.?Lg-wave attenuation and site response in Ningxia region.?Acta Seismologica Sinica,?41(4):?425-434. doi: 10.11939/jass.20180134 shu

宁夏地区Lg波衰减及场地响应特征

    通讯作者: 朱新运, zhuxinyun@126.com
摘要: 本文采用2008—2017年宁夏及邻区内15个数字如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵台站记录的131次如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵的波形资料,基于如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵波衰减与场地响应联合反演方法,分析频率介于1—7 Hz之间的Lg波衰减及场地响应。采用2.2—3.6 km/s的速度窗截取了1 069条Lg波,计算得到Lg波各分量的如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵波衰减品质因子Qf )与频率f之间的关系。结果显示:Lg波垂直、东西及南北向各分量的Q0分别为237.1,201.8及245.9;Qf )对f的依赖性指数分别为0.44,0.52及0.44,该结果与全球其它如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵活跃地区的相应研究结果相一致。对Qf )在时间域的分析结果表明,研究时段内该地区地壳介质的衰减属性并未改变,15个台站的最大场地响应幅值不大于6。

English

    1. 李天斌. 1999. 宁夏南部弧形推覆构造带特征及演化[J]. 地质力学学报,5(3):22–27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.1999.03.004

    2. Li T B. 1999. The feature and formation mechanism of arciform thrust-nappe structure zone of the southern Ningxia[J]. Journal of Geomechanics,5(3):22–27 (in Chinese).

    3. 马禾青,丁志峰,常利军,高武平,蔡新华. 2011. 宁夏地区地壳介质如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵各向异性特征[J]. 地球物理学进展,26(1):61–70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2011.01.006

    4. Ma H Q,Ding Z F,Chang L J,Gao W P,Cai X H. 2011. Features about seismic anisotropy of the crustal medium in Ningxia region[J]. Progress in Geophysics,26(1):61–70 (in Chinese).

    5. 马志江,钟羽云,韩用兵,叶建青,张震峰,林胜法,徐梦林,刘倩倩. 2016. 温州珊溪水库诱发如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵构造条件[J]. 地球科学,41(8):1413–1423.

    6. Ma Z J,Zhong Y Y,Han Y B,Ye J Q,Zhang Z F,Lin S F,Xu M L,Liu Q Q. 2016. The tectonic conditions of Shanxi reservoir induced earthquake in Wenzhou[J]. Earth Science,41(8):1413–1423 (in Chinese).

    7. 秦四清,薛雷,黄鑫,王媛媛. 2010. 青海、甘肃与宁夏地区未来大如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵预测分析[J]. 地球物理学进展,25(4):1168–1174. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2010.04.004

    8. Qin S Q,Xue L,Huang X,Wang Y Y. 2010. Prediction of stronger earthquakes in the Qinghai,Gansu and Ningxia regions[J]. Progress in Geophysics,25(4):1168–1174 (in Chinese).

    9. 师海阔,朱新运,贺永忠,张立恒. 2011. 利用Sato模型对宁夏及邻区尾波Q值的研究[J]. 如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵,31(1):118–126. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3246.2011.01.022

    10. Shi H K,Zhu X Y,He Y Z,Zhang L H. 2011. Q values of seismic coda in Ningxia and adjacent regions based on Sato model[J]. Earthquake,31(1):118–126 (in Chinese).

    11. 师海阔,曾宪伟,张立恒,贺永忠. 2016. 利用Aki模型对宁夏及邻区尾波Q值分布特征的研究[J]. 如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵工程学报,38(1):51–57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0844.2016.01.0051

    12. Shi H K,Zeng X W,Zhang L H,He Y Z. 2016. Distribution characteristics of Q value of seismic coda in Ningxia and neighboring areas based on Aki model[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal,38(1):51–57 (in Chinese).

    13. 向宏发,虢顺民,张秉良,张晚霞,池田安隆,何宏林. 1998. 六盘山东麓活动逆断裂构造带晚第四纪以来的活动特征[J]. 如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵地质,20(4):321–327.

    14. Xiang H F,Guo S M,Zhang B L,Zhang W X,Ikeda Y,He H L. 1998. Active features of the eastern Liupanshan piedmont reverse rault zone since Late Quaternary[J]. Seismology and Geology,20(4):321–327 (in Chinese).

    15. 张国民,傅征祥,王晓青,刘桂萍. 2006. 确定全国如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵重点监视防御区的研究[J]. 中国如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵,22(3):209–221. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2006.03.001

    16. Zhang G M,Fu Z X,Wang X Q,Liu G P. 2006. Study on determination of the national significant seismic monitoring and protection regions[J]. Earthquake Research in China,22(3):209–221 (in Chinese).

    17. 张进,马宗晋,任文军,雷永良. 2007. 滑塌堆积在逆冲构造中的作用:以宁夏牛首山中奥陶统米钵山组为例[J]. 地学前缘,14(4):85–95. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2007.04.009

    18. Zhang J,Ma Z J,Ren W J,Lei Y L. 2007. The role of olistostrome in thrusting:A case study from the Miboshan Formation of Middle Ordovician in the Niushou mountain,Ningxia[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,14(4):85–95 (in Chinese).

    19. 张致伟,周龙泉,程万正,阮祥,梁明剑. 2015. 芦山MW6.6如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵序列的震源机制及震源区应力场[J]. 地球科学:中国地质大学学报,40(10):1710–1722.

    20. Zhang Z W,Zhou L Q,Cheng W Z,Ruan X,Liang M J. 2015. Focal mechanism solutions of Lushan MW6.6 earthquake sequence and stress field for aftershock zone[J]. Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geosciences,40(10):1710–1722 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2015.154

    21. 赵卫明,刘秀景,马禾青. 2002. 宁夏及邻区尾波Q值分布特征[J]. 华南如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵,22(1):23–27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8662.2002.01.004

    22. Zhao W M,Liu X J,Ma H Q. 2002. The distributing characters of coda wave Q value in Ningxia and its adjacent region[J]. South China Journal of Seismology,22(1):23–27 (in Chinese).

    23. 朱新运. 2016. 华北盆地Lg波衰减及台站场地响应特征[J]. 地球科学,41(12):2109–2117.

    24. Zhu X Y. 2016. Characteristics of Lg wave attenuation and site response in North China basin[J]. Earth Science,41(12):2109–2117 (in Chinese).

    25. 朱新运,陈运泰. 2007. 用Lg波资料反演场地效应与如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵波衰减参数[J]. 如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵学报,29(6):569–580. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-3782.2007.06.002

    26. Zhu X Y,Chen Y T. 2007. An inversion of site response and attenuation using Lg waveform[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,29(6):569–580 (in Chinese).

    27. Aki K. 1969. Analysis of the seismic coda of local earthquakes as scattered wave[J]. J Geophys Res,74(2):615–631. doi: 10.1029/JB074i002p00615

    28. Aki K,Chouet B. 1975. Origin of coda waves:Source,attenuation,and scattering effects[J]. J Geophys Res,80(23):3322–3342. doi: 10.1029/JB080i023p03322

    29. Aleqabi G I,Wysession M E. 2006. QLg distribution in the Basin and Range Province of the western United States[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,96(1):348–354. doi: 10.1785/0120040086

    30. Benz H M,Frankel A,Boore D M. 1997. Regional Lg attenuation for the continental United States[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,87(3):606–619.

    31. Borman P. 2002. New Manual of Seismological Observatory Practice[M]. Potsdam: German Research Centre for Geosciences:1?20.

    32. Campillo M,Plantet J,Bouchon M. 1985. Frequency-dependent attenuation in the crust beneath central France from Lg waves:Data analysis and numerical modeling[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,75(5):1395–1411.

    33. Chun K Y,West G F,Kokoski R J,Samson C. 1987. A novel technique for measuring Lg attenuation:Results from eastern Canada between 1 to 10 Hz[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,77(2):398–419.

    34. Chun K Y,Wu Y,Henderson G A. 2009. Lg attenuation near the North Korean border with China,Part I:Model development from regional earthquake sources[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,99(5):3021–3029. doi: 10.1785/0120080316

    35. Domínguez T,Rebollar C J. 1997. Regional variations of seismic attenuation from coda and Lg waves in northern Baja California[J]. J Geophys Res,102(B7):15259–15268. doi: 10.1029/97JB00621

    36. Domínguez T,Rebollar C J,Castro R R. 1997. Regional variations of seismic attenuation of Lg waves in southern Mexico[J]. J Geophys Res,102(B12):27501–27509. doi: 10.1029/97JB02332

    37. Erickson D,McNamara D E,Benz H M. 2004. Frequency-dependent Lg Q within the continental United States[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,94(5):1630–1643. doi: 10.1785/012003218

    38. Fan G W,Lay T. 2002. Characteristics of Lg attenuation in the Tibetan Plateau[J]. J Geophys Res,107(B10):2256.

    39. Fan G W,Lay T. 2003a. Strong Lg wave attenuation in the northern and eastern Tibetan Plateau measured by a two-station/two-event stacking method[J]. Geophys Res Lett,30(10):1530.

    40. Fan G W,Lay T. 2003b. Strong Lg attenuation in the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,93(5):2264–2272. doi: 10.1785/0120030052

    41. Gao L S,Lee L C,Biswas N N,Aki K. 1983a. Comparison of the effects between single and multiple scattering on coda waves for local earthquakes[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,73(2):377–389.

    42. Gao L S,Biswas N N,Lee L C,Aki K. 1983b. Effects of multiple scattering on coda waves in three-dimensional medium[J]. Pure Appl Geophys,121(1):3–15. doi: 10.1007/BF02590116

    43. Hasegawa H S. 1985. Attenuation of Lg waves in the Canadian shield[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,75(6):1569–1582.

    44. Lachet D,Hatzfeld C,Bard P Y,Theodulis N,Papaioannou C,Savvaidis A. 1996. Site effects and microzonation in the city of Thessaloniki (Greece) comparison of different approaches[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,86(6):1692–1703.

    45. McNamara D E,Owens T J,Walter W R. 1996. Propagation characteristics of Lg across the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,86(2):457–469.

    46. Mitra S,Priestley K,Gaur V K,Rai S. 2006. Frequency-dependent Lg attenuation in the Indian platform[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,96(6):2449–2456. doi: 10.1785/0120050152

    47. Murphy J R,Bennett T J. 1982. A discrimination analysis of short-period regional seismic data recorded at Tonto Forest observatory[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,72(4):1351–1366.

    48. Parolai S,Bindi D,Augliera P. 2000. Application of the generalized inversion technique (GIT) to a microzonation study:Nume-rical simulations and comparison with different site-estimation techniques[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,90(2):286–297. doi: 10.1785/0119990041

    49. Parolai S,Orunbaev S,Bindi D,Strollo A,Usupaev S,Picozzi M,DiGiacomo D,Augliera P,Alema E D,Milkereit C,Moldobekov B,Zschau J. 2010. Site effects assessment in Bishkek (Kyrgyzstan) using earthquake and noise recording data[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,100(6):3068–3082. doi: 10.1785/0120100044

    50. Paul A,Jongmans D,Campillo M,Malin P,Baumont D. 1996. Amplitudes of regional seismic phases in relation to crustal structure of the Sierra Nevada,California[J]. J Geophys Res,101(B11):25243–25254. doi: 10.1029/96JB01906

    51. Sato H. 1977. Energy propagation including scattering effects single isotropic scattering approximation[J]. J Phys Earth,25(1):27–41. doi: 10.4294/jpe1952.25.27

    52. Shi J H,Kim W Y,Richards P G. 1996. Variability of crustal attenuation in the northeastern United States from Lg waves[J]. J Geophys Res,101(B11):25231–25242. doi: 10.1029/96JB02580

    53. Sylvette B C,Cécile C,Pierre-Yves B,Fabrice C,Peter M,Jozef K,F?h D. 2006. H/V ratio:A tool for site effects evaluation,results from 1-D noise simulations[J]. Geophys J Int,167(2):827–837. doi: 10.1111/gji.2006.167.issue-2

    54. Zhang J J,Lay T,Zaslow J,Walter W R. 2002. Source effects on regional seismic discriminant measurements[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,92(8):2926–2945. doi: 10.1785/0120010242

    55. Zhang P Z,Burchfiel B C,Molnar P,Zhang W Q,Jiao D C,Deng Q D,Wang Y P,Royden L,Song F M. 1991. Amount and style of late Cenozoic deformation in the Liupanshan area,Ningxia Autonomous Region,China[J]. Tectonics,10(6):1111–1129. doi: 10.1029/90TC02686

    56. Zhu X Y,Chen Y T. 2012. An inversion of Lg-wave attenuation and site response in the North China region[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,102(6):2600–2610. doi: 10.1785/0120110294

    57. Zhu X Y. 2014. An inversion of Lg-wave attenuation and site response from seismic spectral ratios in the eastern China region[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,104(3):1389–1399. doi: 10.1785/0120120359

    1. [1]

      于俊谊 ,?朱新运 , 2016:?浙江地区Lg波路径衰减关系及 台站场地响应参数,?如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵学报,?38,?103-110. doi:?10.11939/jass.2016.01.010

    2. [2]

      朱新运1,3)陈运泰1,2) , 2007:?用Lg波资料反演场地效应与如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵波衰减参数,?如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵学报,?29,?569-580.

    3. [3]

      唐兰兰 李志海 , 2011:?新疆天山中东段地区如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵波衰减、场地响应及震源参数研究,?如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵学报,?33,?134-142.

    4. [4]

      王月 ,?张捷 , 2018:?伪二维弹性波联合反演近地表的速度和衰减,?如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵学报,?40,?595-608. doi:?10.11939/jass.20170196

    5. [5]

      兰从欣1)刘 杰2)郑斯华2)马士振1)李菊珍1) , 2005:?北京地区中小如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵震源参数反演,?如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵学报,?27,?498-507.

    6. [6]

      朱新运 ,?于俊谊 ,?张帆 , 2013:?浙江珊溪水库库区如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵波衰减特征研究,?如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵学报,?35,?199-208. doi:?10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2013.02.006

    7. [7]

      刘文学 ,?刘贵忠 ,?周刚 ,?李欣 ,?张慧民 ,?徐恒垒 ,?王红春 , 2014:?天山及其邻区地壳上地幔S波速度结构的接收函数与面波频散联合反演,?如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵学报,?36,?20-31. doi:?10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2014.01.002.

    8. [8]

      叶秀薇 ,?黄元敏 ,?胡秀敏 ,?刘锦 , 2013:?广东东源MS4.8如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵序列震源位置及周边地区P波三维速度结构,?如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵学报,?35,?809-819. doi:?10.3969/j.issn.0253.3782.2013.06.004

    9. [9]

      张元生1)周民都1)荣代潞1)张立光1)许中秋2) , 2004:?祁连山中东段地区三维速度结构研究,?如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵学报,?26,?247-255.

    10. [10]

      马禾青1,2) 丁志峰1) 常利军1) 高武平3) 蔡新华2) , 2010:?宁夏地区上地幔如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵各向异性特征,?如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵学报,?32,?507-516.

    11. [11]

      张红才 ,?徐嘉隽 ,?陈智勇 , 2015:?基于噪声谱比法的福建台网观测台站的场地响应研究,?如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵学报,?37,?1045-1058. doi:?10.11939/jass.2015.06.014

    12. [12]

      张戈铭 ,?李细兵 ,?郑晨 ,?宋晓东 , 2019:?青藏高原中东部地壳和上地幔顶部P波层析成像,?如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵学报,?41,?411-424. doi:?10.11939/jass.20190003

    13. [13]

      蒋生淼 ,?易磊 ,?张旭 ,?温扬茂 , 2018:?2016年日本熊本如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵破裂时空过程联合反演,?如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵学报,?40,?13-23. doi:?10.11939/jass.20170097

    14. [14]

      张之立1, 邓玉琼2, 王成宝1, 田华1 , 1990:?华北大震序列的断裂系模式及破裂过程的联合反演 ,?如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵学报,?12,?335-347.

    15. [15]

      郑现 ,?赵翠萍 ,?郑斯华 , 2019:?利用多种如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵数据联合反演剪切波速度结构的可靠性检测,?如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵学报,?41,?194-206. doi:?10.11939/jass.20180100

    16. [16]

      林长佑, 武玉霞 , 1993:?大地电磁测深和电偶源频率电磁测深资料反演 ,?如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵学报,?15,?91-96.

    17. [17]

      刘 杰1)郑斯华1)黄玉龙2) , 2003:?利用遗传算法反演非弹性衰减系数、震源参数和场地响应,?如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵学报,?25,?211-218.

    18. [18]

      啜永清 苏 燕 贾建喜 黄金刚 , 2004:?山西地区非弹性衰减系数、场地响应和几种震源参数的研究.,?如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵学报,?26,?369-378.

    19. [19]

      孙勇1, 郑斯华2, 梅世蓉2 , 1991:?唐山余震震源参数和衰减的联合反演,?如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵学报,?13,?422-429.

    20. [20]

      喻畑1) 李小军2) , 2012:?汶川如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵余震震源参数及如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵动衰减与场地影响参数反演分析,?如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵学报,?34,?621-632.

  • 图?1? 如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵台站、震中及如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵射线

    Figure?1.? Distribution of seismic stations,epicenters and seismic rays

    图?2? 衰减参数Qf )与频率f之间的关系

    Figure?2.? The relationship between the attenuation parameter Qf ) and frequency f

    图?3? 15个台站的场地响应

    Figure?3.? Site responses of 15 stations

    图?4? 2 000次反演计算的南北分量的Q0结果

    Figure?4.? Results of 2 000 inversions for Q0 on the north-south components

    图?5? 台站场地响应及对应残差

    Figure?5.? Site responses of the stations and the associated residual errors

    图?6? 如何登录365bet_365bet官网备用网址_365bet体育在线世爵波衰减参数Q0 (a)和依赖性指数 μ (b)的时变曲线

    Figure?6.? The time-varying curves of the attenuation parameter Q0 (a) and the frequency exponent μ (b) of the seismic wave

  • 加载中
图(6)
计量
  • PDF下载量:? 15
  • 文章访问数:? 181
  • HTML全文浏览量:? 91
  • 引证文献数:?0
文章相关
  • 通讯作者:? 朱新运, zhuxinyun@126.com
  • 收稿日期:? 2018-11-12
  • 录用日期:? 2019-05-08
  • 网络出版日期:? 2019-07-01
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1.?

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章
本系统由北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司设计开发?技术支持:?info@rhhz.net 百度统计